However, in an effort to strike a balance between the rights of citizens as well as plans that are executed because of the authorities for the welfare, financial development and prosperity of your nation, the Court did not come up with a definitive ruling around the pending construction in the grid station, but, with the consent of both parties, ordered a review and report of grid project from the National Engineering Services of Pakistan (NESPAK) to suggest alterations and location alternatives.
۔۔۔۔واقعاتی شہادت فوجداری قانون مین درجہ بندی کے لھاظ سے کمزور حیثیت رکھتی ہے۔۔۔ جب تک واقعاتی شہادت کی تمام کڑیاں اس طریقے سے فراہم نہ کی گءی ہوں کہ ایک متواتر زنجیر کی شکل اختیار کرے اور مقتول اور قاتل کے درمیان نہ ٹوٹنے والا سلسلہ قاءم کرے تب تک سزاےموت یا تعزیری سزا /عمر قید کسی کو دینا انصاف کے اصولوں کے منافی ہے۔
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding achieved with the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the conclusion or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may possibly interfere with the summary or the finding and mildew the relief to make it proper to your facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority may be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified through the decision with the Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Usually, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (such as Individuals in very clear violation of established case regulation) towards the higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, as well as the case is just not appealed, the decision will stand.
“Making sure the precision of legal information is paramount,” says Barrister Ayesha Khan, a leading legal expert in Lahore. “Cross-referencing information from multiple highly regarded sources is essential for reliable legal research.”
It allows individuals to research legal issues, understand their rights, and prepare for legal proceedings. This access is particularly important in Pakistan, where legal support is often high-priced and hard to attain.
Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there may be a person or more judgments provided (or reported). Only the reason with the decision of the majority can represent a binding precedent, but all may very well be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning may be adopted within an argument.
Upholding Justice: The application in the regulation along with the subsequent punishment of the guilty party provide a perception of closure and justice for the victim’s family and loved kinds.
The prosecution presented substantial evidence, including eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature of the seized currency.
In simple terms, the section states that any person who commits intentional murder shall be subjected towards the death penalty or life imprisonment, along website with a possible fine.
Preserving Social Order: By imposing strict penalties for murder, Section 302 PPC reinforces the principle of social order and stability. It demonstrates the commitment with the state to protect its citizens and copyright the rule of regulation.
The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the sensible application of this amendment and its potential to secure financial interests and maintain the integrity of the national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, an extensive grasp of those changes is significant for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a sturdy legal system.
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition on the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Growth Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their neighborhood, on designated “green belt” property. The Court read the matter as a human rights case, as Article 184 (three) of the Pakistan Constitution supplies primary jurisdiction into the Supreme Court to consider up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
dismissed as not pressed and sentences awarded into the appellant in this case is altered into imprisonment, which appellant has already undergone.(Criminal Jail Appeal )